Tuesday, March 24, 2009

A public service announcement



I'm very guilty of calling things "gay" in a negative context. But, to be fair, so are my gay friends. I have no problem with this word, used in this particular context, to eventually fade out of our culture.

But Hilary, please give us an alternative. We can't just quit cold turkey.

So, may I propose to use the word: CIGARETTE -- why? Because in England, cigarettes are fags.

Plus, the culture has already villified smoking.

"Those clothes are so cigarette"

"Quit acting like a cigarette."

"Cigarette Rights Now!
"

Labels:

Technically, Its my first Simpsons Episode



By night I work on comics. By day I work in animation. This is my first job that I am required to use a pencil instead of a mouse.

This isn't the first episode I worked on, but its the first one that aired. It was the "problem" episode where people had to work on the weekend and do overtime. Partially to make a St. Patrick's day deadline.

I only did two or three shots in this entire show. Its not even enough to get credit as Character Layout.

approx. 7:35 - Glasses clink

approx. 18:49 - Policeman hitting table (though I think someone changed that)

approx. 18:50 - 2 Policeman turn table over. (Forgot if I actually revise that or if I just had it shortly and then someone else got it.)

But it I learned a few things from the director.

My first real episode (the one I actually animated main characters) that airs either in late April or May.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Kiyoshi Nakazawa - luckynakazawa.com

One of the featured artists at Physical Nostalgia was Kiyoshi Nakazawa. He does a great zine called Drunken Master.
He has this very raw yet graphic style. Some of it reminiscent of Zen Brush Painting, some of it more urban and punk rock.
He also sells original prints if you're interested. www.luckynakazawa.etsy.com

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, March 14, 2009

A collection of Watchmen/Hostess Parodies

Since that piece I did has brought me some attention, or at least upped my numbers whenever you search my name on google, I've been also searching "watchmen hostess" and have found other parodies.

My earliest memories of the Hostess Ads was that when I was a kid, I had an issue of Spider-Man with a Spider-Man Hostess Ad and it REALLY CONFUSED ME. I thought it was part of the comic book. I was, maybe, in the second or third grade. But the beauty of these ads was the campy way that Hostess products were used to save the world or something.

1)The first, I have no idea who did it.

I like the "voice-over editing". Its a nice homage to Alan Moore's words and timing. But this thing was scanned in low rez and the fruit was just sort of hacked out and pasted on.

2)I think this was in the back of an issue of Deep Fried by Jason Yungbluth, but I'm not sure.

One thing I hate about parodies, not because of the artist, but because of the legal reasons, is that all the names are replaced. I think this artist could've gotten away with naming the character Rorschach.
Giving Twinkies to dogs to distract them actually seems realistic. It might've actually worked in the Watchmen world. And what I loved about the Hostess Ads was that the use of Twinkies as a solution to crime made sense only in a Hostess Comic Book Universe.
But the dialog is pretty funny. The dialog's in the Hostess world.
I didn't like the coloring, too many gradients, wrong color pallet (but that might also be a legal thing), its obviously done in photoshop, it would've looked beautiful if he just used the color halftone filter and made it look like bad printing. The thing I love about a good parody is that for a second, you're not sure if this is the real thing or not. I've worked with Photoshop too much and if he just added that one detail-- it would've made up for the use of fake names.

3)Here's a well-rendered one done by Brian Michael Bendis... I think.


What I love about it is that it pretty much sticks to Dave Gibbons's style. It looks like it was colored with marker, though. But its better than making it all slick and photoshoppy. But the semen joke, its just too adolescent for me. Its an easy joke. Its a desperate joke.

4)Of course I'm biased. I have a high opinion of my work:

The biggest difference about my Watchmen/Hostess Parody is that it takes place in a universe that has Hostess Comics Ad logic. The others take place in a Watchmen world. And I wanted it to be devoid of any real logic. So preventing rape with the use of Hostess Fruit Pies makes no sense in our world or the Watchmen world.

It did cross my mind to have Silk Spectre I be the victim. But then it wouldn't be funny. Sexual violence toward women is really really fucked up. I don't find it funny at all. I was once an animator on a cable show where there was a rape joke involving a female character and a bunch of inmates. If I was the one assigned to animate that scene, I would decline. I have no idea if that was eventually cut by the network execs.

But male rape is funny...
At least to the guy doing the raping.

Also I think the first unsaid rule of being a man is that you don't get raped. A boy can get raped, and that's horrible and he ought to get some help. A girl can get raped and that's a lot more horrible, especially when such a union creates a child. But man on man forced sexual copulation-- its demeaning... but its really funny when its happening to someone who deserves to be demeaned.

(Just to make myself clear, I see nothing homosexual about man rape. Its sexual sport like in Sodom and Gommorah or the State Penn. There are much more hilarious and interesting things about gay culture than man sex. Like when you're in the Castro, you should check out Little Orphan Andy's you gotta love their mascot)

Plus the line, "Oh no! The Comedian is raping Richard Nixon!" has a ring to it.

The beauty of Watchmen was that it deconstructed what began as a childish genre and made it adult (or adolescent-- if you look at how it influenced the genre too). So I took adult characters and themes and put them back in a childish world. In other words, another difference between my Hostess Parody and the others is that its a deconstruction of a deconstruction.

I will confess that I "inked" Dave Gibbons's original work. "Inked" in a "Chasing Amy" sense. I wanted it to look like Gibbons pencilled it and maybe someone else inked it. I didn't color it because it wasn't for print or for the public to think of it as print, plus I was lazy.

The back story, or at least the fictitious back story, of this piece was that someone was payed to make this comic as a real ad, but it got rejected for obvious reasons. It eventually resurfaced at an art exhibit. Besides, I find original comic book art beautiful. You get to see where the artist made their mistakes, sometimes they used different inks so that some of the linework fades to a purplish color. Its a physical object, something that was handmade-- not like a comic book which is machine made.

I think the best parodies are near forgeries. And I did my best to make this a faithful forgery.

But the only thing in this piece that looses the authenticity is the Hostess packages in the end. Now it doesn't show on the jpeg, but if you saw the real thing, it looks like a computer print out pasted onto the page because it is a computer print out pasted onto the page. I originally wrote in red pencil, "apple" & "cherry", but that didn't sell the joke. It didn't have the right impact at the end (just like the movie). I didn't have time to draw it in, or make a believable print-out, I just found a pic of an original ad, did my photoshop magic, cut, paste, wa-la!

Anyway, I've been thinking too much about this piece all week. Hopefully, getting all this out of my head will help me move on. Hopefully, I could stop jerking myself off with this damned piece and do things that don't require me riding on the coattails of Comic Book Legends.

(But I am thinking of doing other Hostess parodies that also look like artwork that's 20 or 30 years old. Hey, this one sold, I'm going to get laid off again for hiatus at the end of the week. I needs the money.)

And here's one last thought.

Labels: , , , ,

Watchmen -- my review and obvious spoilers

I'm not going to get into how much I love the original masterpiece. Its obvious. I mean, my work is viral with the Nixon and the Hostess and all.

But by the end of that movie I walked out of the theater disappointed. I was tempted to walk out when Laurie was talking to her mother about her real father, but I stuck around hoping it'll be saved in some way. It was too late, but the shot of New York being reconstructed was a nice touch which could've been used in the comic.

Almost all the changes, I felt were valid. Pacing is important in a film. Some parts they had to shorten or take out. I'm not one of those fans yelling: "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE PIRATE STORY??!!!"

The chemistry between Nite Owl and Silk Spectre II didn't exist at all. The actress who played Silk Spectre II wasn't mature enough for that role. I could live with having a younger person play that role, but she needs to be a better actress.

Nite Owl was good enough. I think his non-heroic voice made up for Nite Owl not looking silly.

The Comedian was okay. I think they could've done something to his voice so he sounded older. But he looks too much like Robert Downey Jr.

Rorschach was perfect. Dr. Mahnattan was good. Ozymandius -- wasn't villainous enough, he couldn't pull of the moral dilema that he had.

I was okay with the fact that this film lacked subtlety. In the comic, the sentence "The Comedian is Sally's father" was never said, it was implied. In the comic, the sex scenes had a sort of subtlety to them. More like having real sex than watching porn. The slow motion shots-- like when Veidt got shot-- I could live with that, but too many.

Some scenes, like the opening sequence and Nite Owl & Silk Spectre fighting in jail, I didn't like when I saw them on youtube. But put into context, they were fine.

BUT!!!!

Putting the blame on Dr. Manhattan didn't make sense to me. Even though Dr. Manhattan was blamed for destroying millions on US and Russian soil, Russia would still jump the gun and immediately send their nukes to the US. Hell, the entire world would blame the US. When people get pissed, they need to blame something. And when they blame something, they'll do something about it. There would still be a nuclear war.

I don't care if there wasn't a giant one-eyed vagina squid creature, but the thing that saves the world needed to be an alien threat! It had to be! Its what brought everyone together in "Independence Day".

That part made me cringe. Everything to that point, I felt-- "Okay, this is a nice tribute to Alan Moore's and Dave Gibbons's work. This is like a high budget fan film." But the ending-- the ending made me cringe!!!!

V for Vendetta still stands as the best Alan Moore inspired film.

I understand your pain, Mister Moore.

PS... Attempted rape isn't as fucked up as actual, or at least implied rape. This movie could've been more cynical. That's why the comic was great.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 12, 2009

i09 - The Last Watchmen Story You Need Ever Read

http://io9.com/5167686/the-last-watchmen-story-you-need-ever-read

So I'm mentioned there too. A lot more comments on it.

...damn, should've charged 500 hundred for that piece.

Anyway, I assume that eventually Dave Gibbons and Alan Moore will get links to this site on their e-mail. So, addressed to both of them, here is an open letter:

Dear Revered Comic Book Gods,

I have enjoyed your work for many years. I have a bunch of "Give Me Liberty", I'm sorry, I haven't read "The Originals".

And to Mister Moore, you are why I read Tarot cards and why cute girls buy me drinks at bars because I do Tarot readings for them. You are my favorite writer. Please do not put a curse on me like you did to the movie to make it late.

---yeah, I'm a bit brain dead, I'm at work, about ready to go home and I've been watching old episodes of AstroBoy on a DVD player as I animate crowd scenes.

I really would have no idea what to say to Alan Moore or Dave Gibbons.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Why I haven't watched the Watchmen--yet

I love the Watchmen. I actually have original Watchmen issues-- I think up to issue 3. I read all of Watchmen when I was about sixteen. I can explain to you why Watchmen is a great piece of Superhero Deconstructionist Literature and exactly how it deconstructs superhero archetypes.

So why haven't I watched the Watchmen?

Well, for the past couple of weeks I've been swimming in it. I went to WonderCon and there was Watchmen! I made a great piece, that sold by the way, and it was basically me drawing (and sometimes tracing) Dave Gibbons's style. I go to the bookstore: Watchmen. I go on my favorite websites: Watchmen. I look outside, Watchmen.

My dad even wants to see it, which is weird, like he'll understand something of my subculture.

I want to take a breather from Watchmen. I will see it soon, just not this week.

-----

But since we're on the subject of Watchmen, its sort of weird that its surfaced. That this thing that was "in the know" is out now. Something very important in my little comics subculture is out in public. A lot of people have read Watchmen now.

That's really weird. I first read it when I was sixteen. A kid in my class saw me read it and looked at the price of the trade paperback-- sixteen or seventeen bucks back then, and said, "are you crazy? sixteen bucks for this?"

But for me, shelling out $16 for a graphic novel was like someone normal buying a record.

I rarely buy records, and if I do, they're songs you don't hear on the radio-- at least American radio.

Anyway, back when I read it when I was 16, it was very slow and very boring to me. I did like Dr. Manhattan's chapter, Rorschach's chapter and the end. But I didn't think the book was a masterpiece until I came back to it when I was 22 or 23. When I read it when I was older, the dialog yelled out to me. I could hear it, in my head.

So when people read Watchmen and say its boring, I use that as a barometer on how mature they are. Its as if their brain is a sixteen-year-old brain.

----------

I've noticed a lot of Watchmen fan art that makes them into a parody. Like baby Watchmen or Watchmen Saturday Morning cartoons. I've also added to this meme.

I think its because Watchmen was a deconstruction of what started out to be a genre for children. Thus, making the superhero genre something adult. And by making Watchmen childish, then we're further deconstructing a deconstruction. Or rather, a sort of reconstruction.

--I think.

--I could just be talking out of my arse.

But one great thing about Watchmen is that its boosted people's interest in comics. Average non-comics readers, after reading Watchmen, ask "what else have you got?"

More people reading comics is a good thing-- at least for me. Hopefully I can make a comfortable living off of it.

Also consider, back in the days of the Depression, comics were the biggest form of entertainment. Now we're heading into, possibly, another Depression.

Hopefully, there'll be work for me.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, March 9, 2009

Heidi MacDonald's THE BEAT

I was mentioned on the comics blog, "The Beat". Why? Because I depicted a US president getting sexually molested by a comic book character, that's why.

Actually, its more of a link to the LA Weekly blog. But I'm mentioned by name anyway and it ups my numbers when I narcissisticly google my name.

Although, I have had one e-mail asking where they could find an image of the entire thing and pointed them to this here blog.

Labels: , , , ,

Kamen Rider Decade



When I was at WonderCon, I was enlightened to Kamen Rider Decade. Its like Crisis on Infinite Sentai. Crazy ass apokalyptic battles with guys in plastic armor, affordable CG and non-color corrected compositing.

For other Sentai news, visit "The Good, The Bad, The Godzilla"

Labels:

LA Weekly review of Physical Nostalgia

http://blogs.laweekly.com/style_council/art/rorschach-blue-marilyn-watchme/



"So wrong, and yet so dead on."

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, March 8, 2009

"Presidential Trouble"



I just sold this piece at Meltdown Comics. As I've heard, a guy who works on Family Guy bought it.

It was placed at this weird corner which was sort of hard to see. My friend who curated the gallery said that he put it there so that the laughter would echo in the room. I think that's one of the reasons. But I think, partially, its because of the subject matter.

I'm not complaining. I'd put it there too and I was a little worried on how it would be received. The thing got sold. And it was fun standing there to see people's reactions: laughter or confusion.

I have two other pieces at the gallery show.

And not only am I referencing Watchmen but also old ads you'd find in comics.

(added March 12)
Also, because I didn't expect for this piece to get so viral, I'd like to give credit where credit is due. Some panels (especially panel 4) I "inked" from the original Gibbons work. Some, I copied by eye. Some, a combination (in panel 3 its the same pose for the Comedian, but different costume).

The joke wouldn't be as clear if I didn't "ink" Mr. Gibbon's fine work.

And since I made money on this and I am not a thief, I will share the meager 150 bucks I made on this piece with Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons ONLY in the form of a meal on me, or perhaps some drinks, or maybe pie.

yes... a fruit pie.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Phyisical Nostalgia - Watchmen Inspired Art Show

PN Solo Card

PHYSICAL NOSTALGIA

@ MELT GALLERY

7522 Sunset Blvd, L.A., CA, 90046

323.851.7223

March 7 – 22, 2009

Artist’s Reception Saturday, March 7 from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.


The Melt Gallery at Meltdown is proud to present PHYSICAL NOSTALGIA, A group art showing that will serve as an examination of Alan Moore and Dave Gibbon’s graphic novel WATCHMEN and how the themes and images contained therein have permeated pop art culture.

An artist’s reception party will take place on Saturday, March 7, 2009 from 7:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. and is sponsored by Asahi beer.

Curator Marz Richards says, “PHYSICAL NOSTALGIA will exhibit a wild variety of art styles and media to present facets of this seminal work that will be lost as WATCHMEN transitions from the page to the silver screen. Now is the last moment for the knot-tops and grizzled vigilantes of art to stand up and show us what WATCHMEN means to them as the last five minutes of the doomsday clock tick away.”

Exhibiting artists include Eldon Asp, Steven Daily, Howard Hallis, Mack Hill, Jim Mahfood aka FOOD ONE, Kiyoshi Nakazawa, Jeret Ochi, Osgood Perkins, Raymond Persi, Renfield, Fill Marc Sagadraca, Christopher Stangl, Elan Trinidad and Gustavo Garcia Vaca with items from the private collections of John Cogan and David Mandel.

The show will continue in exhibition from March 7 until Saturday, March 22 at the Melt Gallery.

www.meltcomics.com

Labels: , , , , ,